<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediatomics &#187; Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediatomics.com/tag/browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediatomics.com</link>
	<description>Online communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 without webbrowser</title>
		<link>http://www.mediatomics.com/2009/06/13/windows-7-without-webbrowser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediatomics.com/2009/06/13/windows-7-without-webbrowser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediatomics.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody happy? At the planned introduction on October 22nd 2009. Windows 7 will be delivered without the system-integrated web browser Internet Explorer (&#8216;Internet Exploder&#8217; to some). Actually &#8211; and so the story goes on June 13, 2009 &#8211; no web browser at all will be delivered with this new operating system. Thus Microsoft meets the ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Everybody happy?</h2>
<p>At the planned introduction on October 22nd 2009. Windows 7 will be delivered without the system-integrated web browser Internet Explorer (&#8216;Internet Exploder&#8217; to some). Actually &#8211; and so the story goes on June 13, 2009 &#8211; no web browser at all will be delivered with this new operating system.<br />
Thus Microsoft meets the demands of the European Union, and especially Euro commissioner Kroes. She has been investigating Microsoft for some time now, and accuses the company of abusing its dominant position in the market. The stripped version of Window 7 will be a Europe-only operating system. This decision by Microsoft will certainly please the vast amount of sceptic Windows-users. After all, they have been complaining for years about Internet Explorer, which because of its integration with the operating system, was able to keep its dominant position quite easily. That and the never ending flood of patches and security updates, makes that this decision by Microsoft will be welcomed by a lot of people, &#8230; right?</p>
<p><span id="more-11"></span></p>
<h2>EU itself is &#8216;not amused&#8217;</h2>
<p>Not everybody is happy however. And the first to come forward is now the EU itself. That is a surprise. What&#8217;s going on here? The EU now is afraid that a less usable operating system will hit the market, because it will be lacking a web browser. The EU has expected an operating system in which the user would be offered a choice at first use. It currently seems like this is not going to happen.<br />
Of course, offering the user a choice would be the right way to solve this. I feel however that a choice, any choice, should be based on proper and complete information. How thought through can a decision be when the user is confronted with a situation that shows a row of radio buttons, the above one representing a choice for Internet Explorer. Not unlikely that this radio will default be checked. The majority of users probably won&#8217;t even recognise the names of alternatives like Chrome, Safari, Opera and Firefox.<br />
I guess that in a ideal world every web user informs himself on the different alternatives for web browsing and the pro&#8217;s and cons of each of these alternatives, before installing anything. After all, we are still lightyears away from a pc that is fully idiot, hacker and real-world proof. By the way: has anybody already found that website which compares the different browsers in a way that the average user can understand?</p>
<h2>The only hope for those who seek &#8216;integration&#8217;</h2>
<p>Outside of Europe Microsoft will continue the course it has been pursuing for years. So there still is some hope for those who seek an operating system with an integrated web browser. Just go shopping in the US, China, Russia or any other country outside of the European Union. Note that it will probably be difficult to get hold of a Dutch version though.</p>
<h2>The alternatives</h2>
<p>For those who don&#8217;t already know the alternatives; here&#8217;s the shortlist.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/internet-explorer/" target="_blank">Microsoft Internet Explorer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mozilla.com/" target="_blank">Mozilla Firefox</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/" target="_blank">Apple Safari</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.opera.com/" target="_blank">Opera</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediatomics.com/2009/06/13/windows-7-without-webbrowser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome has arrived</title>
		<link>http://www.mediatomics.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-has-arrive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediatomics.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-has-arrive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webstandards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediatomics.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After weeks of buzztalk, it is finally available for download: Google Chrome. A new web browser that technically borrows from Apple&#8217;s webkit and Firefox. Yesterday [September 2nd 2008] at work this was the topic of the day; where to download Chrome. Yesterday evening at  21.09h I found the download location. For now Chrome will only available for the ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After weeks of buzztalk, it is finally available for download: Google Chrome. A new web browser that technically borrows from Apple&#8217;s webkit and Firefox.</p>
<p>Yesterday [September 2nd 2008] at work this was the topic of the day; where to download Chrome. Yesterday evening at  21.09h I found the <a title="Klik om Google Chrome te downloaden" href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">download location</a>. For now Chrome will only available for the Windows platform.</p>
<p>The first reactions on the news of Google launching a new web browser varied. On one side one finds those who see Chrome as yet another web browser that adds nothing for the average user, but forces developers to expand their testing labour to also cover Chrome. A quote from ZDnet: &#8220;Why on earth do we need another browser? One more damn thing to develop exceptions for &#8211; AND ZERO value to endusers &#8230;&#8217;<br />
Others welcome Chrome and claim that compatibity problems should be small provided one adheres web standards. This last claim is probably true as the Chrome engine borrows from  Apple&#8217;s webkit and Firefox; engines that have implemented standards quite well. Besides that; major compatibility problems still arise with all versions of Microsoft Internet Explorer, so how could this be an issue with Chrome (?).</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m asking myself however what the added value might be? And in which area should browsers be competing with each other when the&#8217;re currently all growing towards ever better honouring the web standards. Who needs more of the same? <br />
 <span id="more-35"></span></p>
<h2>First impressions</h2>
<p>I just installed Chrome. The first impression is definitely positive. It&#8217;s looks reflect simplicity and a focus on functionality. No bells and whistles for this new kid on the block. It starts in a second.</p>
<p>One feature that will definitely please a lot of users is a startpage showing thumbnails of recently and frequently visited websites. Besides that one may configure the startpage in a number of ways. There&#8217;s probably one to your liking. For developers Chrome default comes with colored source code, a javascript console and a javascript debugger; things you may also find in Firefox.<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-72" title="Splash screen Google Chrome" src="http://www.mediatomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/about_google_chrome.gif" alt="Splash screen Google Chrome" width="470" height="333" />Through a built in taskmanager any crashed tab may be closed when needed. The built in &#8216;stats for nerds&#8217; inform the diehard user on things like memory use of every browser instance and tab. This includes other browsers when active.<br />
Interesting is a new functionality built into the adress bar. As soon as you start typing, Chrome suggests websites and possible searches. For the average user this may lead to confusion however. It would have been nicer had this been offered as a configuration option. </p>
<h2>Added value</h2>
<p>So Chrome has some tools for developers that compare with those offered by Firefox. But Firefox currently also offers a world of addons to further enhance it. These addons are currently not available for Chrome. Other than that: Chrome offers functionality that we also find in the Beta 2 of Internet Explorer. This includes the independently  <a title="Klik voor meer informatie over tabbladen in Chrome." href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95622&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">functioning tabs</a>, and <a title="Klik voor meer informatie over 'incognito' mode." href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95464&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">&#8216;incognito&#8217;-mode</a>. One thing that still is not available in IE8 however is a better way to manage your bookmarks. Then again: we&#8217;re still looking at Beta 2.</p>
<p>So despite the fact that Google now offers a sympathetic browser with Chrome, the question remains whether Chrome adds some essential feature, which makes it stand out from the rest of the browser base.<br />
An absolute plus however is the  fact that  <a title="Klik voor meer informatie over de broncode van Google Chrome" href="http://code.google.com/chromium/" target="_blank">the sourcecode is released to the community</a>.</p>
<p>All in all a nice start for this new kid on the block. Let&#8217;s give it a chance and check back in half a year or so and discover how Chrome has developed technically and in terms of functionality. Let&#8217;s also see how this browser is welcomed by the community of developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediatomics.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-has-arrive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

